Miomir Kecmanovic vs Quentin Halys Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Kecmanovic has a slight edge in winning second serve points, at 49.02% compared to Halys' 48.6% over the past six months. Could this small advantage influence the match outcome?
• Return Game Effectiveness: Kecmanovic also outperforms Halys in return stats, capturing 46.68% of opponents’ second serve points and 24.78% on first serves, compared to Halys’ 44.04% and 20.54%, respectively.
• Handling Pressure: On breakpoints, Halys fares better, saving 58.37% compared to Kecmanovic’s 55.79%, a critical factor in tight matches.
• Overall Success Rate: In the past year, Halys boasts a superior win rate at 55.38%, compared to Kecmanovic's 48.33%. Will their recent performance impact this match?
• Surface Preference: Kecmanovic excels on clay with 60% wins, while Halys’ favorite surface is indoor hard courts with a 59% win rate. Does this match surface favor one over the other?
• Tour-Level Experience: Both players have primarily competed on the Main tour, with Halys slightly more successful at 54.84% compared to Kecmanovic’s 48.15% wins.
• Direct Head-to-Head: In their only prior encounter, Halys defeated Kecmanovic, suggesting a psychological edge in this match-up.
• Match Duration: Previous matches between them averaged over three hours, indicating closely contested battles.
• Deciding Set Performance: Halys dominates with a 61% win rate in deciding sets over the last year, compared to Kecmanovic’s 39%, providing him with an advantage if the match extends to a deciding set.
• Opponent Quality: Kecmanovic has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 81.32 compared to Halys’ 139.32.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Kecmanovic is slightly more effective in breakpoint conversion at 28.57% versus Halys’ 25.32%.

Editorial Prediction (July 28, 2025, UTC):

Kecmanovic's superior return game stats and better breakpoint conversion offer him slight advantages in the match. These could prove crucial if the match remains tight and serves are frequently broken.

While both players have strengths, Halys’ better overall win rate in the last year and his previous victory over Kecmanovic may give him a psychological edge heading into this encounter.

However, the performance under pressure is crucial, with Kecmanovic typically facing higher-ranked opponents, preparing him for tougher matches. His proficiency on clay might be a factor if the match is played on this surface.

Considering the data, Halys seems more likely to claim victory, particularly if he can maintain his edge in deciding sets.